Which strategy best supports students' understanding of a poem with anthropomorphic elements?

The chosen strategy effectively enhances students' comprehension of a poem that includes anthropomorphic elements, which involve attributing human traits, emotions, or intentions to non-human entities, such as animals or inanimate objects. By discussing how the fog is described using animal traits, students are encouraged to engage with the text on a deeper level. This activity allows them to explore the connections between the human experience and the characteristics assigned to the fog, thereby fostering a more nuanced understanding of the poem's meaning and emotional impact.

Additionally, this approach prompts students to think critically about the choices made by the poet in their descriptions and how those choices shape the overall theme and mood of the poem. This level of engagement with the text is particularly significant when dealing with anthropomorphism, as it invites students to interpret and relate to the poem in a way that goes beyond surface-level summarization or technical textual analysis.

In contrast, the other options do not provide the same depth of analysis or connection to the anthropomorphic elements present in the poem. Identifying alliteration focuses solely on sound and poetic technique, summarizing the literal events doesn't engage with deeper constructs, and analyzing the historical context may lack immediacy to the poem's thematic exploration of human-like qualities in non-human subjects